Supreme Court BANS Him For Good — His FATE Is Sealed

Judge's hand holding a gavel over a sound block — Photo: Freedomz / Shutterstock

The Florida Supreme Court suspended Larry Klayman for two years over clear conflicts and client-misconduct findings, and later reports say the United States Supreme Court removed him from its bar.

Story Highlights

Florida’s high court imposed a two-year suspension on Larry Klayman after affirming misconduct findings.
The Bar detailed conflict-of-interest violations tied to lawsuits against Judicial Watch and client-representation issues.
Reporting says the United States Supreme Court disbarred Klayman from its bar following earlier suspensions.
A federal court in Florida suspended him based on the state action, showing reciprocal discipline in practice.

Florida Court Confirms Misconduct And Orders Two-Year Suspension

The Supreme Court of Florida approved a referee’s findings that Larry Klayman committed professional misconduct and ordered a two-year suspension. The court’s opinion explains it reviewed the full report, affirmed the conclusions, and assessed $4,536.93 in costs against him. The official case record confirms the proceeding and the sanction’s entry date. The Florida Bar profile lists Klayman as suspended as of November 6, 2025, matching the court’s action and timeline for enforcement within the state.

The Florida Bar’s public notice outlines the misconduct that drove the sanction. It says Klayman represented plaintiffs in three suits against Judicial Watch, the group he founded and once served as general counsel, without obtaining needed conflict waivers. It also says he continued to act for a client after she ended the relationship and publicized her case against her wishes. These acts reflect basic duty failures to avoid conflicts and follow client direction.

Reported United States Supreme Court Disbarment And Prior Suspensions

Published reports state that the United States Supreme Court disbarred Klayman from its bar after first suspending him and ordering him to show cause. Those accounts also note discipline in other jurisdictions before the high court’s action, framing a multi-court pattern rather than a single event. While secondary outlets used the term disbarment for the Supreme Court step, the Florida action itself was a two-year suspension. Readers should distinguish between the separate forums and sanctions.

The Florida Supreme Court opinion indicates the record contained Klayman’s own writings to a client about his ability to serve her. The court described statements where he said his emotions made him “nonfunctional as a lawyer,” which undercut his capacity to provide competent representation during the dispute. That material weighed against him when the court decided the appropriate penalty and confirmed the need for a defined suspension period.

Reciprocal Discipline Extends The Florida Action Into Federal Court

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida treated the Florida suspension as grounds to suspend Klayman from practice in that federal court. The order cites the state discipline and applies a matching consequence for federal practice. This is a common result under reciprocal discipline rules that protect courts and clients when a lawyer is restricted by another tribunal’s final order.

Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman disbarred by Supreme Court. https://t.co/TBV6VzGS7s #ethics #legalethics #SCOTUS @KevDavis pic.twitter.com/CnYD0iXnNB

— ABA Journal (@ABAJournal) November 11, 2026

The Florida Supreme Court’s opinion and the Bar’s notice offer the clearest verified specifics. They identify conflict-of-interest violations tied to Judicial Watch litigation and client-direction breaches. Secondary stories supply the reported Supreme Court bar outcome but do not reproduce the high court’s order or docket. That means the exact language of the Supreme Court’s action is not shown in the available record used here, but the reported outcome is consistent across outlets.

What This Means For Readers Who Value Accountable Courts

Courts depend on lawyers who avoid conflicts and honor client choices. Florida found serious breaches and imposed a set term. Federal court followed suit through reciprocal rules. Reports say the United States Supreme Court also removed Klayman from its bar. For conservatives who expect equal rules for everyone, this chain shows how discipline should work: clear findings, defined penalties, and consistent follow-through across courts to protect clients and the justice system.