Judge Slashes Rapist’s Sentence in Half

A Kentucky judge slashed a jury’s recommended 65-year sentence for a defiant rapist and kidnapper to just 30 years, citing his youth and struggles as a young Black male—sparking fury over soft-on-crime wokeness.

Story Highlights

• Christopher Thompson, 24, convicted of 2023 kidnapping, robbery, sodomy, and sexual abuse; jury urged 65 years, judge gave 30.
• Thompson spewed profanity and threats at the judge during sentencing, showing zero remorse.
• Judge Tracy Davis overrode jury, emphasizing rehabilitation potential and societal challenges for young Black males.
• Prosecutor and councilmember blast decision as endangering public safety; backlash explodes on social media.

The Brutal Crimes and Jury Verdict

In 2023, Christopher Thompson, then 18 or 19, abducted a woman from her vehicle in Louisville, Kentucky. He forced her to perform oral sex in a school parking lot, robbed her at an ATM, and sodomized her again at gunpoint. A jury convicted him in December 2025 on charges of kidnapping, robbery, sodomy, and sexual abuse. The panel recommended 65 years in prison, reflecting community demand for severe punishment for such violent offenses against an innocent victim.

Defiant Courtroom Outburst

On February 2, 2026, Jefferson County Circuit Judge Tracy Davis presided over sentencing in Jefferson County Circuit Court. Thompson erupted in defiance, yelling profanities like “Eat my d**k” and “If I could spit on you, I would.” He mocked the victim with “I don’t have sympathy for nobody… Boo hoo,” showing utter lack of remorse. Davis added over four years for contempt, to serve first, yet proceeded to halve the jury’s recommendation despite this unrepentant behavior.

Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
https://t.co/GnGMtvNJHr

— Townhall Updates (@TownhallUpdates) February 10, 2026

Judge’s Rationale Overrides Justice

Davis justified the 30-year sentence by noting Thompson’s youth at the time of the crimes and his potential for rehabilitation in prison. She referenced societal challenges faced by young Black males, framing him as someone not “beyond being rehabilitated.” This decision ignored the victim’s trauma and the jury’s consensus, highlighting Kentucky law’s broad judicial discretion to deviate from recommendations in felony cases. Critics see this as prioritizing defendant excuses over public safety.

Prosecutor and Officials Demand Accountability

Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney Gerina D. Whethers expressed deep disappointment, noting the sentence fell to less than half the jury’s determination. Louisville Metro Council Minority Caucus Chair Anthony Piagentini criticized the leniency, questioning victim safety and demanding transparency on Davis’s use of shock probation in dozens of cases since 2023. These voices underscore tensions between judicial independence and accountability in an era of rising violent crime concerns.

Public Backlash Fuels Reform Calls

As of February 10, 2026, outrage spread rapidly via social media and local news after viral posts on February 9. The case erodes trust in the judiciary, raising fears of early parole for Thompson after his contempt term. It amplifies national debates on soft-on-crime policies rooted in post-2020 reforms, bolstering law-and-order demands. In Trump’s America, where border security triumphs over open-door chaos, this local failure spotlights the need for tougher sentencing to protect families and restore justice.

Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence https://t.co/EvI4UrZvdT

— Marlon East Of The Pecos (@Darksideleader2) February 10, 2026

Sources:

Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence

Louisville judge criticized for reduced sentence in violent kidnapping, sexual assault case