ActBlue’s admission to lacking preventive measures against illegal foreign donations has sparked significant scrutiny.
At a Glance
- House Republicans subpoenaed ActBlue over foreign-sourced donations
- ActBlue improved its security to comply with election laws
- Legislation proposed to require stricter vetting of donations
- Treasury investigates flagged transactions on ActBlue
Subpoenas and Investigations
House Republicans issued a subpoena to ActBlue to gather data regarding questionable transactions and donor vetting processes. Their aim is to ensure election integrity by addressing system loopholes, especially in verifying donor identities. Chairman Steil stated, “We cannot allow foreign actors to influence our elections through campaign financing. The Committee’s investigation uncovered that foreign actors might be taking advantage of ActBlue’s inadequate security protocols.”
This investigation coincides with a major review by the Treasury Department of ActBlue’s flagged transactions. These transactions, identified by banks as potentially suspicious, prompt regulatory action to avert illegal foreign influence in upcoming elections.
.@Jim_Jordan and I are demanding answers from Sift regarding potentially fraudulent transactions made on ActBlue. I’m committed to preventing foreign funding in our elections. https://t.co/0nBLMEb6OP
— Bryan Steil (@RepBryanSteil) December 10, 2024
Strengthening Compliance
ActBlue has begun updating its security policies post-scrutiny from Republicans. Previously criticized for not requiring CVV numbers for donations, ActBlue’s changes mark a critical step toward addressing concerns. These updates aim to “close loopholes in our campaign finance system,” as warned by Bryan Steil.
Additions to security include verifying transaction details to prevent repeat issues. ActBlue’s recognition of these drawbacks underscores the need for digital fundraisers to maintain a transparent and legally compliant platform.
🚨BREAKING NEWS: There’s now more evidence that illicit overseas donors are using the corrupt Democrat donor platform ActBlue to exploit campaign finance loopholes and make donations in the names of people without their knowledge.
These are fraudulent, ILLEGAL practices that… https://t.co/qcu9Ugy447
— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) October 24, 2024
Legislative Actions and Broader Implications
Steil has initiated new legislation demanding stricter vetting processes for donors. Besides enforcing CVV verification, the legislation aims to bar contributions from prepaid gift cards. Although it passed the committee, a full House vote is still pending, emphasizing the urgency to safeguard electoral processes.
“Illegal and malicious conduct have no place in our elections. Ensuring all parties are complying with federal election law as we approach a presidential election is of utmost importance. By launching a new phase of our investigation into ActBlue, the Committee on House Administration has begun robust oversight of ActBlue’s lenient donor verification standards. I’m committed to ensuring Americans can have confidence in our elections and to preventing foreign or malicious actors from influencing American elections.” – Chairman Bryan Steil
State attorneys general from three states—Virginia, Wyoming, and Missouri—have begun similar probes, adding pressure for compliance. This highlights the importance of election transparency as we approach another presidential race. A recent committee hearing with the FEC emphasized the need for action and established precedents to protect the integrity of the democratic process.
ActBlue has a security flaw: it accepts donations from untraceable gift cards bought with cash, and no ID verification.
To prove it, I did it.
Here’s a thread explaining a ludicrously simple loophole for abusing ActBlue🧵
(Read in FULL before conspiracy theorizing) https://t.co/wNUV1RUa0v
— Parker Thayer (@ParkerThayer) October 24, 2024
Sources
1. Chairman Steil Launches Expanded Investigation into Online Political Donations Through ActBlue